Essential Sand Geotechnical Parameters for use in Advanced Soil Models

This note is a compact reference note that brings together practical definitions, typical value ranges, and commonly used empirical correlations for sand, with frequent pointers to the original literature and a consistent reminder that correlations have limits and should only be applied within their intended scope. The content is organized into four parameter groups, each presented as its own table: (1) dilatancy and strength parameters—including relative density, critical-state and peak friction, dilatancy measures, and CPT-based correlations—intended for simpler strength and deformation descriptions; (2) critical-state and critical-state–based parameters, such as the critical-state void ratio and the state parameter , used to interpret whether a sand is likely contractive or dilative and to support more state-aware assessments; (3) small-strain stiffness parameters for the Hardening Soil Small (HSS) framework, centered on Gmax and strain-dependent stiffness reduction; and (4) intergranular strain overlay parameters used with hypoplastic models when full calibration data are not available. Taken together, the tables function as a practical parameter-selection cheat sheet that links common index and test inputs (e.g., CPT, triaxial results, grain-size descriptors) to parameters used in Mohr–Coulomb (MC), Hardening Soil (HS), Hardening Soil Small (HSS), and hypoplasticity (HP) models, while emphasizing careful, context-aware application and encouraging readers to consult the primary sources.

GeoBer-01: Buckling of piles (release of PBuckling_V0)

Classical pile buckling analysis commonly relies on Engesser’s solution, which assumes a uniform lateral support stiffness along the embedded pile length. While this analytical approach is useful for rapid checks and conceptual understanding, its applicability is limited to idealized soil conditions. In practice, soil stiffness varies with depth and is often characterized by layered profiles in which weak strata of finite thickness are interbedded with stronger layers. In such cases, the governing buckling behavior is controlled not by an average stiffness value, but by the spatial variation of soil stiffness and the corresponding deformation modes of the pile. PBuckle.V0 addresses these limitations through a finite element–based formulation that allows depth-dependent lateral stiffness defined directly by the user, supports piecewise-constant or linearly interpolated stiffness profiles, explicitly captures local buckling modes triggered by weak layers, and accurately identifies the true minimum critical buckling load—even when it occurs at a higher buckling mode rather than the first mode.

PBuckle.V0 is provided as an engineering analysis and research tool intended to support understanding of pile buckling behavior under idealized modeling assumptions. While care has been taken in the development and verification of the program, the results produced are dependent on user input, modeling choices, and assumptions regarding soil and structural behavior. The software does not replace professional engineering judgment, independent verification, or project-specific design checks. Any use of PBuckle.V0 in engineering projects is undertaken at the user’s own responsibility and accountability, and the developer assumes no liability for the application of the results in design, construction, or decision-making processes.

Find the application following the link

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Gy3PBlHYF4huelK8u9lil0M8_9oPlyst/view?usp=drive_link